翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Luica River
・ Luicidal
・ Luicidal (album)
・ Luico Hopper
・ Luidger of Utrecht
・ Luidia
・ Luidia australiae
・ Luidia ciliaris
・ Luidia clathrata
・ Luidia magnifica
・ Luidia quinaria
・ Luidia sarsi
・ Lugones, Santiago del Estero
・ Lugongolweni
・ Lugos
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
・ Lugotorix
・ Lugovaya
・ Lugovi
・ Lugovi, Pljevlja
・ Lugovka
・ Lugovoy
・ Lugovoye
・ LugRadio
・ Lugrin
・ Lugro-Mesh
・ Lugros, Granada
・ Lugshegu
・ Lugsteuring
・ Lugton


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Lugosi v. Universal Pictures : ウィキペディア英語版
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures

''Lugosi v. Universal Pictures'', 603 P.2d 425 (Cal. 1979), was a decision of the Supreme Court of California respecting the personality rights of celebrities, particularly addressing whether these rights descended to the celebrities' heirs. The suit was brought by the heirs of Béla Lugosi, who sued Universal Studios in 1966 for using his personality rights without the heirs' permission. The trial court ruled in favor of the Lugosi heirs, but Universal Studios won the case in an appeal. The court determined that a dead person had no right to his likeness, and any rights that existed did not pass to his heirs.〔
==History==
In September 1930, Béla Lugosi and Universal Pictures Company, Inc. had entered into an agreement for the production of the film ''Dracula'' in which Lugosi played the title role under a signed contract. Hope Linninger Lugosi, his widow, and Bela George Lugosi, his son, filed a complaint against Universal on February 3, 1966, alleging that they were the heirs of Béla Lugosi and that Universal had, commencing in 1960, appropriated and continued to appropriate property which they had inherited from Lugosi and which was not part of the agreement with Universal. The Lugosis asserted that from 1960 until the present time, Universal entered into many licensing agreements which authorized the licensees to use the Count Dracula character.

"(heirs ) seek to recover the profits made by (Studios ) in its licensing of the use of the Count Dracula character to commercial firms and to enjoin (Studios ) from making any additional grants, without () consent .... The action, therefore, raises the question of whether Béla Lugosi had granted to () in his contracts with () merchandising rights in his movie portrayal of Count Dracula, the nature of such rights, and whether any such rights, if retained by Béla Lugosi, descended to the (heirs ) ...."


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Lugosi v. Universal Pictures」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.